Politics drive political decisions
“It is absolutely essential that the negotiators get a continuous and repeated exposure to the science of climate change,” Pachauri told Reuters in ...
“It is absolutely essential that the negotiators get a continuous and repeated exposure to the science of climate change,” Pachauri told Reuters in ...
To continue musing why some people don’t’ accept climate science, I wonder if part of the blame lies with those of us who want legislative action. We̵...
I’ve finally decided I can’t claim to write about science and politics without actually writing about science and politics. People want to make gene...
Here’s Matthew Bailes on climate science and astronomy: It may come as a big surprise to many, but there is actually no difference between how science wor...
I understand the Zack Beauchamps out there apply a national politics filter to almost everything they write. I get why they spend time on climate change and ste...
Liberal bloggers have been attacking National Review’s Kevin Williamson for arguing politicians’ scientific beliefs don’t matter: Why would an...
Pretty busy this week with some applications, so I’ll leave you with a few links: Why we still pay for academic journals even though everything is now onl...
Sorry for the long break–I’ve been traveling the past two weeks. I did, however, keep a mental list of topics I wanted to raise. Given that I̵...
Environmental ethicist Donald Brown insists there are practical consequences to ignoring the ethical dimensions of climate change: Although the conclusions reac...
It’s hard for me to think straight right now, but please check out Andy Revkin’s short write up. I’ve just lost a mentor and a friend.